substance

Carbon tetrabromide

Formula
CBr4
CAS
558-13-4
InChIKey
HJUGFYREWKUQJT-UHFFFAOYSA-N
ChEBI
CHEBI:47875

Show in the process graph →

Made by

Used by

No process in the Atlas uses this yet.

When a process with this chemical is added to the library, it appears here.

Takes part in

Routes compared

One route in the Atlas makes Carbon tetrabromide: nothing to compare yet. A comparison appears when a second route is added.

Per 1 kg of Carbon tetrabromide: inventory from each route's LCI dataset, unallocated; footprints per the functional unit of their own LCA.

RouteTier, design maturity, review statusGeography, yearEnergyFeedstocksKey emissionsFootprintComparability
Carbon tetrabromide by semi-batch haloform bromination of acetone in aqueous hypobromite (314 t/a)Batch plant: bromine dosed over 1.7 h into dilute caustic soda at 278 K (sodium hypobromite, semi-batch), acetone dosed over 4.5 h into the cold hypobromite with tetrabutylammonium bromide (haloform reaction, semi-batch), CBr4 precipitated, filtered, reslurry-washed with water and vacuum-dried at 308 K in two agitated filter-dryers; 450.91 kg per batch, 696 batches a year on a dedicated trainflowsheet or hand-writtenDesign maturity: Concept (research)Not independently reviewedDataset review: unreviewedGLO, 2026
  • Electric power: 0.23 kWh
  • LP steam 350 kPa(a) (to the dryer's hot-water circuit): 0.161 kWh
  • Process water (dilution): 3.8 kg
  • Caustic soda 50 wt% (chlor-alkali-1): 2.15 kg
  • Tetrabutylammonium bromide (phase-transfer catalyst, merchant): 0.00975 kg
  • Liquid bromine (bromine-1): 1.95 kg
  • Acetone (acetone-1): 0.186 kg
  • Process water (cake wash): 1.95 kg
  • Rinse water of R-101 and F-101 between batches: 2.22 kg
  • Nitrogen for inerting R-101 and pressing the filtrations in F-101: 0.0832 kg
noneno footprint–

ISO 14044 requires a critical review (by a panel of interested parties, ISO/TS 14071) of a comparative assertion intended to be disclosed to the public. These routes are listed side by side for screening; a statement that one is better than another needs that review. None of these routes has had such a review.