substance
Copper(I) chloride
ChEBI not looked up in this change; identity from PubChem (PUG REST, 2026-11-06).
- Formula
- CuCl
- CAS
- 7758-89-6
- InChIKey
- OXBLHERUFWYNTN-UHFFFAOYSA-M
Made by
- Copper(I) chloride by semi-batch chlorination of copper in brine, dilution precipitation and filter-drying (300 t/a)Main productConcept · not reviewed
Used by
No process in the Atlas uses this yet.
When a process with this chemical is added to the library, it appears here.
Takes part in
- CuCl2+Cugives2CuClProduct · Reduction of copper(II) chloride by copper metal (comproportionation) · one process
Routes compared
One route in the Atlas makes Copper(I) chloride: nothing to compare yet. A comparison appears when a second route is added.
Per 1 kg of Copper(I) chloride: inventory from each route's LCI dataset, unallocated; footprints per the functional unit of their own LCA.
| Route | Tier, design maturity, review status | Geography, year | Energy | Feedstocks | Key emissions | Footprint | Comparability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper(I) chloride by semi-batch chlorination of copper in brine, dilution precipitation and filter-drying (300 t/a)Batch plant: chlorine dosed below the surface of a 300 g/L NaCl brine over excess copper at 353 K (semi-batch, the copper heel kept for the next batch), the liquor cooled and diluted with about 7 volumes of deoxygenated water, CuCl precipitated, settled, filtered, washed with dilute hydrochloric acid and ethanol and vacuum-dried at 333 K under nitrogen in an agitated filter-dryer; a tenth of the mother liquor to the next brine; 355.0 kg per batch, 846 batches a year on a dedicated train | flowsheet or hand-writtenDesign maturity: Concept (research)Not independently reviewedDataset review: unreviewed | GLO, 2026 |
|
| none | no footprint | – |
ISO 14044 requires a critical review (by a panel of interested parties, ISO/TS 14071) of a comparative assertion intended to be disclosed to the public. These routes are listed side by side for screening; a statement that one is better than another needs that review. None of these routes has had such a review.