mixture

Diesel (desulfurised gas oil)

Middle-distillate hydrocarbons distilling between 180 and 380 degC (IPCC 2006 Vol. 2, chapter 1, Table 1.1) after hydrodesulfurisation (about 10 mg/kg S); composition by crude and unit. No composition recorded yet: one goes in only with its source (docs/registry.md, Fuel mixtures). hydrotreating-1 models it as C470H897 in its own dataset (ASSUMED, not a registry value).

Show in the process graph →

Made by

Used by

No process in the Atlas uses this yet.

When a process with this chemical is added to the library, it appears here.

Routes compared

One route in the Atlas makes Diesel (desulfurised gas oil): nothing to compare yet. A comparison appears when a second route is added.

Per 1 kg of Diesel (desulfurised gas oil): inventory from each route's LCI dataset, unallocated; footprints per the functional unit of their own LCA.

RouteTier, design maturity, review statusGeography, yearEnergyFeedstocksKey emissionsFootprintComparability
Gas oil hydrodesulfurisation to ultra-low-sulfur diesel (fixed-bed CoMo hydrotreater)fixed-bed CoMo/alumina hydrodesulfurisation of straight-run gas oil at about 40 to 70 barg and 330 to 390 degC with recycle gas, stripping and drying (REF BREF 2.13)Tier 1 (sourced conceptual)Design maturity: Concept (research)Not independently reviewedDataset review: unreviewedRER, 2010
  • Fuel to the reactor feed heater (refinery fuel gas, taken as methane): 0.00798 kg
  • Electricity: 0.015 kWh
  • Straight-run gas oil, about 0.5 wt-% sulfur: 0.997 kg
  • Hydrogen make-up: 0.00785 kg
  • Wash water injected into the reactor effluent: 0.0349 kg
  • Combustion oxygen, from ambient air: 0.0318 kg (free)
  • Steam (stripping and heating), by mass: 0.105 kg
  • CoMo/alumina hydrodesulfurisation catalyst: 0.0000459 kg
  • CO2 from the feed heater: 0.0219 kg
  • Water vapour from the feed heater: 0.0179 kg
  • NOx (as NO2) from the feed heater: 0.000013 kg
  • SO2 from the feed heater: 0.00000349 kg
  • CO from the feed heater: 0.00000349 kg
no footprint–

ISO 14044 requires a critical review (by a panel of interested parties, ISO/TS 14071) of a comparative assertion intended to be disclosed to the public. These routes are listed side by side for screening; a statement that one is better than another needs that review. None of these routes has had such a review.