substance
Methyltriphenylphosphonium bromide
A Wittig reagent precursor; a white hygroscopic powder (PubChem CID 74505). No ChEBI entry found (EBI OLS search by InChIKey and name, 2026-11-06).
- Formula
- C19H18BrP
- CAS
- 1779-49-3
- InChIKey
- LSEFCHWGJNHZNT-UHFFFAOYSA-M
Made by
- Methyltriphenylphosphonium bromide by semi-batch quaternisation of PPh3 with methyl bromide in toluene (820 t/a)Main productConcept · not reviewed
Used by
When a process with this chemical is added to the library, it appears here.
Takes part in
- C18H15P+CH3BrgivesC19H18BrPProduct · Quaternisation of triphenylphosphine with methyl bromide · one process
Routes compared
One route in the Atlas makes Methyltriphenylphosphonium bromide: nothing to compare yet. A comparison appears when a second route is added.
Per 1 kg of Methyltriphenylphosphonium bromide: inventory from each route's LCI dataset, unallocated; footprints per the functional unit of their own LCA.
| Route | Tier, design maturity, review status | Geography, year | Energy | Feedstocks | Key emissions | Footprint | Comparability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Methyltriphenylphosphonium bromide by semi-batch quaternisation of PPh3 with methyl bromide in toluene (820 t/a)Batch plant: PPh3 dissolved in recovered toluene (20 wt%), liquefied methyl bromide dosed over 3 h into the closed, nitrogen-padded glass-lined pressure vessel at 333 K (semi-batch, 1.05 mol per mol PPh3 with the recycled excess), the salt precipitated and cooled to 313 K, filtered, reslurry-washed with recovered toluene and vacuum-dried at 333 K in an agitated filter-dryer; the toluene and the excess methyl bromide distilled in a batch still and reused; 1057.10 kg per batch, 776.6 batches a year on a dedicated train | flowsheet or hand-writtenDesign maturity: Concept (research)Not independently reviewedDataset review: unreviewed | GLO, 2026 |
|
| none | no footprint | – |
ISO 14044 requires a critical review (by a panel of interested parties, ISO/TS 14071) of a comparative assertion intended to be disclosed to the public. These routes are listed side by side for screening; a statement that one is better than another needs that review. None of these routes has had such a review.