Hydrocracking of vacuum gas oil, single-stage recycle

Sourced conceptual inventory per tonne of hydrocracked products (LPG to diesel range, unsplit): conversion, bleed, hydrogen, fuel, power, water and catalyst from EU REF BREF ranges, closed by surrogate-compound element balances. No flowsheet; not reviewed.

Calculation maturity: not assessedDesign maturity: Concept (research)Not independently reviewedRefiningReport a problem with this process
Research outputNot engineering advice and not an approved design: do not use it for construction, operation or safety decisions. What this means

Overview

Sourced conceptual inventory per tonne of hydrocracked products (LPG to diesel range, unsplit): conversion, bleed, hydrogen, fuel, power, water and catalyst from EU REF BREF ranges, closed by surrogate-compound element balances. No flowsheet; not reviewed.

Capacity
per tonne of hydrocracked products (the dataset's basis); no plant size

What goes in and out

In

  • Vacuum gas oilFeedstock
  • HydrogenReactantchemical consumption; linked to hydrogen-1 (lca/mappings.yaml)
  • MethaneFeedstockheater fuel, natural gas taken as pure methane (ASSUMED; a refinery fires mostly its own fuel gas)
  • AirFeedstockcombustion air, free; its O2 is feed:O2
  • WaterFeedstockwash water, ASSUMED equal to the sour water

Out

Utilities: Electricity

Show in the process graph

Life cycle assessment

No footprint assessed yet; the process is part of the life-cycle inventory below.

In the LCI database: system model, datasets and KPIs against the benchmarks

In the LCI database

Status
Preliminary 4 unmapped exchanges. Some exchanges have no background mapping yet: they are exported unlinked and count no burden, so the inventory is incomplete.
System model
attributional, cut-off (methodology 1.1.0)
Allocation
energy (physical-energy, from mappings) · product:fuel-gas 1.1 %, product:hydrocracked-products 96.5 %, product:unconverted-oil 2.4 %
Allocation findings
none
Change report
Not available: this build has no change report against an earlier release.
Dataset pages
Refinery fuel gas, C1-C2 gas to the refinery fuel system (after amine treating) Preliminary · Hydrocracked products (LPG to diesel range), Hydrocracked products, LPG to diesel range (unsplit) Preliminary · Hydrocracker unconverted oil (bleed), Unconverted-oil bleed (to FCC, fuel oil or lube base oil) Preliminary

KPI benchmark positions

KPIValueReference rangePosition
Hydrogen chemically consumed per t of fresh feed, vacuum gas oil hydrocracking
No open per-mass range independent of the dataset found (2026-11-05). The REF BREF range (Table 3.62, 260 to 400 Nm3/t) is the dataset's own source. Per-barrel figures (US DOE 1998, Energetics, section 4.1.4: 1000 to 2500 scf/bbl) need a feed density to become kg/t, a modelling step. Searched: open reviews and course notes on VGO hydrocracking (only scf/bbl or single pilot-test values, e.g. Peng et al. 2018, Front. Chem. Sci. Eng. 12:867).
– kg/tnot availablenot evaluated
Sour water per t of fresh feed, hydrocracking
No open range independent of the dataset found (2026-11-05). The REF BREF range (section 3.13.2, 50 to 110 l/t) is the dataset's own source; no other open source read for this entry states a hydrocracker waste-water flow.
– kg/tnot availablenot evaluated
Electricity per t of fresh feed, hydrocracking
No open range independent of the dataset found (2026-11-05). The REF BREF range (Table 3.66, 20 to 150 kWh/t, after Sema, Sofres 1991 and VROM 1999) is the dataset's own source. Read and not usable: US DOE 1998 (Energetics, Table 4-8, per bbl), DOE 2006 Energy Bandwidth (no hydrocracking section), PRELIM v1.5 documentation (no values printed).
– kWh/tnot availablenot evaluated

Maturity and review

Design maturity Concept (claimed): An idea or first flowsheet; numbers are rough. No independent engineering review yet. Automated checks passing is not a review.

Calculation maturity, from the checked evidenceNot assessed

The process has no maturity report (cheme maturity, checks/maturity.json), so no calculation maturity is established.

No level shownThe design maturity (Concept) is the manifest's claim, not evidence. A level appears here once the process's repository holds a current report from cheme maturity --write.

Artifact completeness

Which deliverables exist. They never raise a calculation maturity level: a drawing from unchecked numbers is still unchecked.

Not reported without a maturity report.

Independent review

Not independently reviewed

No independent engineering review yet. Automated checks passing is not a review.

Set by people only. Reaching a calculation maturity level or passing automated checks is not an independent review or an approval.

Where the evidence comes from
Report
processes/hydrocracking-1/checks/maturity.json (not in the library)
Method
How ChemE-as-Code checks the levels (requirement by requirement)

Open items

Sources

Library version
a3c52e4 (process last changed in a3c52e4)
Data
Catalog record (JSON) · CC-BY-4.0
Files
View the files on GitHub · change history and authors

References

How to cite

For the data, cite the Process Atlas paper; for the platform that builds and checks it, the ChemE-as-Code paper.

Schweidtmann, A. M. & Weber, J. M. (2026, in preparation). Process Atlas: an open, git-native, reproducible library and life cycle inventory of chemical processes (working title).

For this process: "Hydrocracking of vacuum gas oil, single-stage recycle", ChemE-as-Code process library, version a3c52e4.

BibTeX
@unpublished{schweidtmann_process_atlas,
  author = {Schweidtmann, Artur M. and Weber, Jana M.},
  title = {{Process Atlas: an open, git-native, reproducible library and life cycle inventory of chemical processes (working title)}},
  year = {2026},
  url = {https://atlas.cheme-as-code.org},
  note = {in preparation}
}

Schweidtmann, A. M. (2026). ChemE-as-Code: An Open-Source Platform for Agentic AI in Chemical Engineering. arXiv:2611.07947. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2611.07947

BibTeX
@misc{schweidtmann_cheme_as_code,
  author = {Schweidtmann, Artur M.},
  title = {{ChemE-as-Code: An Open-Source Platform for Agentic AI in Chemical Engineering}},
  year = {2026},
  eprint = {2611.07947},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  doi = {10.48550/arXiv.2611.07947},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.07947}
}